Skip to Content

Innodata Inc.

Corporate Governance / Derivative

  • Date:
  • 5/6/2024
  • Company Name:
  • Innodata Inc.
  • Stock Symbol:
  • INOD
  • Class Period:
  • FROM 5/9/2019 TO 2/14/2024
  • Status:
  • Filed
  • Filing Date:
  • 2/21/2024
  • Court:
  • U.S. District Court: District of New Jersey

Case Finder

Locate any case using the tools below.

Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm, is investigating potential claims against Innodata Inc. (NASDAQ: INOD) on behalf of long-term stockholders following a class action complaint that was filed against Innodata on February 21, 2024 with a Class Period from May 9, 2019 to February 14, 2024. Our investigation concerns whether the board of directors of Innodata have breached their fiduciary duties to the company.

The lawsuit alleges that on February 15, 2024, Wolfpack Research published a report revealing that Innodata misrepresented the nature and extent of its business and operations. The Wolfpack Report showed that Innodata’s AI is really “smoke and mirrors” and that the Company’s marketing claims are like “putting lipstick on a pig.” While the Defendants touted Innodata’s status as an AI pioneer, other companies were only hiring Innodata for cheap labor and its operations were powered by thousands of low-wage offshore workers, not proprietary AI technology. Innodata also stopped disclosing its Research and Development spend after the first quarter of 2021. The Wolfpack Report highlighted that Innodata’s total R&D investment over the past five years was only $4.4 million, with even less allocated to R&D in 2023 than what was spent on promoting its “AI” technology through press releases.
 
Throughout the Class Period, the complaint alleges Defendants made false and/or misleading statements, as well as failed to disclose material facts, including that Innodata: (1) did not have a viable AI technology; (2) its Goldengate AI platform is a rudimentary software developed by just a handful of employees; (3) it was not going to utilize AI to any significant degree for new Silicon Valley contracts; (4) it was not effectively investing in research and development for AI; and (5) based on the foregoing, Defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about Innodata’s AI business and development and related financial results, growth, and prospects.
 
On this news, the price of Innodata common stock declined by $3.74 per share, or approximately 30.5%, on February 15, 2024.

If you are a long-term stockholder of Innodata, have information, would like to learn more about these claims, or have any questions concerning this announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please contact Brandon Walker or Marion Passmore by email at investigations@bespc.com, by telephone at (212) 355-4648, or by filling out the form below. There is no cost or obligation to you.
The individual or institution below (“Plaintiff”) has reviewed and agrees to the Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C. (“BESPC”) retainer agreement and authorizes BESPC to prosecute an action on Plaintiff’s behalf under the federal securities laws or applicable state laws to recover damages on behalf of investors in Innodata Inc.. BESPC will prosecute the action on a full contingency basis and will forward all costs and expenses.
 

Case Finder

Locate any case using the tools below.

You may share a link to this page on any of the sites listed below or send link via email: